Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophins for triggering ovulation in assisted conception.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND The objective of this systematic review was to assess the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous recombinant (r) HCG and high-dose rLH compared with intramuscular urinary (u) uHCG for inducing final oocyte maturation and triggering ovulation. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (August 27, 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL on The Cochrane Library, issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2004) and EMBASE (1980 to February 2004). Searches were not limited by language. The bibliographies of included and excluded trials and abstracts of major meetings were searched for additional trials. Authors and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for missing and unpublished data. Only truly randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Assessment of inclusion/exclusion, quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by at least two reviewers. RESULTS Seven RCTs were identified, four comparing rHCG and uHCG and three comparing rhLH and uHCG. There was no statistically significant difference between rHCG and uHCG regarding the ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate [odds ratio (OR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.39], clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate or incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). There was no statistically significant difference between rhLH and uHCG regarding the ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.50-1.76), pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate or incidence of OHSS. rHCG was associated with a reduction in the incidence of local site reactions (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.32-0.70). CONCLUSIONS According to these data, there is no evidence of a difference in clinical outcomes between urinary and recombinant gonadotrophins used for induction of final follicular maturation. Additional factors should be considered when choosing gonadotrophin type, including safety, cost and drug availability.
منابع مشابه
Efficacy of Highly Purified Urinary FSH versus Recombinant FSH in Chinese Women over 37 Years Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Techniques
متن کامل
Bye-bye urinary gonadotrophins? Recombinant FSH: a real progress in ovulation induction and IVF?
Whether recombinant gonadotrophin products do, indeed, represent progress for routine ovulation induction and IVF cycles, in comparison with urinary products, has remained controversial. Here we review published data with regard to respective risks, outcomes and cost for both medication options. Safety considerations favour recombinant products, while overall outcome and cost considerations fav...
متن کاملPolycystic ovary syndrome: a simplified approach based on the evolving set of symptoms.
similar regardless of whether urinary or recombinant gonadotrophins are used. In this article the author refers to the study of Gleicher et al. (2000), which makes no comparison between urinary and recombinant products, but instead questions whether ovulation induction in general should be replaced by IVF as a means of reducing the risk of higher order multiple pregnancy. To conclude, I feel th...
متن کاملP-165: Comparison of Urinary and Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin during Ovulation Induction in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles
Background: Urinary human chorionic gonadotropin is the most widely used medicine for ovulation in ovarian stimulation cycles. Recently however, recombinant HCG has also become commercially available. This study presents compare the use of recombinant hCG with urinary hCG during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intra uterine insemination (COH-IUI ) cycles Materials and Methods: This is s...
متن کاملThe efficacy of recombinant versus urinary HCG in ART outcome
BACKGROUND Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) has been used as a replacement for the mid-cycle luteinizing hormone (LH) surge for several years. The recent arrival of recombinant DNA technology has made recombinant HCG (rHCG) accessible. OBJECTIVE To assess efficacy of rHCG compared to urinary HCG (uHCG) for triggering of ovulation and induction of final oocyte maturation in assisted reproduc...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Human reproduction
دوره 20 8 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005